Reply to Narration of Imam As-Suyutee

Now a days Milad Supporter Started Argument with Brothers and Sister that, What do you say about the narration of Imam As-Suyutee wherein which he said:

"Another primary text has occurred to me by which the legitimacy of the Mawlid can be derived, namely what is reported by al-Bayhaqee from Anas that ‘the Prophet صلى الله عليه و سلم performed Aqeeqah for himself after his prophethood.’ And it occurs that his grandfather Abdul Muttalib performed the Aqeeqah for him when he was a child of seven years, and the Aqeeqah is not repeated a second time. So therefore this is to taken to mean that what the Prophet صلى الله عليه و سلم did was to openly manifest gratitude for Allaah making him the mercy for the universe and to legislate this for his Ummah, just as he used to do by his sending salaam upon himself. Therefore it is recommended for us that we openly manifest gratitude for his birth."

(‘Husnul Maqsad’ of as-Suyutee contained in his ‘Haawi lil Fataawi’)

Responce:

This is Online Link of the Narration which is use by Imam Suyutee ==>http://goo.gl/xrVoPl

This Narration is Classified Zaeef by Jamor Muhadiseen Including Imam Bayhaqi :)

* Imam Bayhaqi itself Said : 'Abdullah ibn Muharrar reported a munkar (rejected) Hadith

you can see in the online Narration link that After this naration Imam Bayhaqi said:

قَالَ عَبْدُ الرَّزَّاقِ : إِنَّمَا تَرَكُوا عَبْدَ اللَّهِ بْنَ مُحَرَّرٍ لِحَالِ هَذَا الْحَدِيثِ ، قَالَ الْفَقِيهُ رَحِمَهُ اللَّهُ : وَقَدْ رُوِيَ مِنْ وَجْهٍ آخَرَ ، عَنْ قَتَادَةَ ، وَمِنْ وَجْهٍ آخَرَ ، عَنْ أَنَسٍ ، وَلَيْسَ بِشَيْءٍ .

Abdur-Razzaq said, 'Indeed they (scholars of Hadith) abandoned 'Abdullah ibn Muharrar due to the state of this Hadith and it is reported from another perspective from Qatadah and yet another perspective from 'Anas and it is nothing.'

Note: This is the reference from which as-Suyuti quotes the Hadith, yet it is strange that he did not quote the rest of al-Bayhaqi's words.

And He Said: "This is a rejected Hadith, and 'Abdullah ibn Muharrar is da'if, being agreed upon to be so by the memorising scholars. He ('Abdullah ibn Muharrar) is abandoned."

[Majmu' Sharh Muhadhdhab (8/330) of an-Nawawi, Chapter: Aqiqah]]

* Imam An-Nawawi Said:

وأما الحديث الذي ذكره في عق النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم عن نفسه فرواه البيهقي بإسناده عن عبد الله بن محرر- بالحاء المهملة ، والراء المكررة - ، عن قتادة ، عن أنس أن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم عق عن نفسه بعد النبوة . وهذا حديث باطل

"As for the Hadith that he - i.e. Ash-Shayrazi - mentioned concerning the Prophet's performing aqiqah for himself, then it was reported by al-Bayhaqi with his isnad from 'Abdullah ibn Muharrar from Qatadah from 'Anas … [Hadith] … and this Hadith is false (batil)."

[Ref: Majmu’ Sharh Muhadhdhab an-nawawi 8/330]

* Imam Adh-Dhahabi Said:

بعد أن ذكر ترجمة عبد الله بن المحرر ،وكلام الحفاظ فيه ،وأنه متروك، وليس بثقة – ومن بلاياه – عبد الله بن المحرر – روى عن قتادة عن أنس أن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم عق عن نفسه بعدما بُعِث .

during the course of presenting the biography of 'Abdullah ibn Muharrar, "Ahmad said: the people have abandoned his Hadith. Al-Jawzajani said: destroyed. Ad-Daruqutni and a group (of scholars) said: abandoned. Ibn Hibban said: he used to be from the best of the servants of Allah except that he would lie without knowing it, and reverse (the meanings) of the narrations without understanding ... "

[Mizan al-I'tidal]

* Imam Hafiz Ibn Hajr Said:

تفرد به عبد الله محرر – وهو ضعيف

“This hadith is rejected because it contains Abdullah Bin Muharrar, and he is severely weak"

[Talkhis al-Habir 4/147]

Likewise in Fath al-Bari He declares the Hadith from all of it's various perspectives to be da'if.

[Sharh Bab Imatatul-'Adha]

Imam az-Zarqani in his Sharh Muwahib (1/140) follows up his quote by quoting the verdicts of Ibn Hajr and an-Nawawi on this Hadith and then saying, "Therefore to use it to derive the legitimacy (of the Mawlid) is not correct."

قال أبو داود في " مسائله " : سمعت أحمد حدثهم بحديث الهيثم بن جميل ، عن عبد الله بن المثنى، عن ثمامة ، عن أنس أن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم ( عق عن نفسه ) ، فقال أحمد عبد الله بن محرر ، عن قتادة ، عن أنس أن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم ( عق عن نفسه ) ، قال مهنا : قال أحمد : هذا منكر ، وضعف عبد الله بن المحرر .

Imam Abu Dawud said in his Masa'il Imam Ahmad his work in which he reports from him, "I heard Ahmad … so Ahmad said, 'Abdullah ibn Muharrar from Qatadah from 'Anas that 'The Prophet sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam performed aqiqah for himself.' This Hadith is munkar (rejected) due to the weakness of 'Abdullah ibn Muharrar.' " [This was report was also mentioned by Ibn al-Qayyim in his Za'ad al- Ma'ad and Tuhfatul Mawdud bi Ahkamil Mawlud (pg. 51)]

* Imam Maalik was asked about this narration and he replied:

“Do you see the Companions of the Messenger of Allaah for whom the Aqeeqah was not performed in the days of Jaahiliyyah, performing Aqeeqah for themselves in Islaam? This is from the rejected (narrations)" [Ibn Rushd al-Maaliki: AL-Muqaddamaat al-Mumahhadaat 2/15]

* Shaikh Ibn Baaz :

ضعيف أو موضوع.

Its Zaeef And muzo

[Al-Tohfa Tul Karim fi Bayan Baz Ahadith, H: 35]

For more detail See ==>> http://www.alukah.net/sharia/0/53663/

And http://goo.gl/y3SLNh